My Comments
No need to worry joxearkaitz. I know things seem harsh right now, but I really believe that Anonymous and the rest of the critics will be a good thing for scientology in the long run. See, the Church of Scientology has been giving ALL of scientology a bad name. All this attention they are recieving right now will hopefully get them to make the necessary adjustments to ease the concerns we have about it.
Older religions have faced hundreds of years of criticism and making adjustments - in the process they gained trust, grew and became stronger because of it.
If you really believe in the benevolence of Scientology, then be assured that it will stand this test and will emerge improved in the end.
|
|
Linda Greenhouse, legendary New York Times reporter looks back on three decades chronicling the Supreme Court—including her run-ins with the journalism ethics police
Radar's guide to discussing Mad Men properly
Can you tell the difference between real upcoming movies and Radar's fakes?
Charles Kaiser on Conservative Pundits' Love Affair with Sarah Palin
Good news and bad news for Obama, farewell to Paul Newman, and this Week's Winners and Sinners


|
|
 |
No need to worry joxearkaitz. I know things seem harsh right now, but I really believe that Anonymous and the rest of the critics will be a good thing for scientology in the long run. See, the Church of Scientology has been giving ALL of scientology a bad name. All this attention they are recieving right now will hopefully get them to make the necessary adjustments to ease the concerns we have about it.
Older religions have faced hundreds of years of criticism and making adjustments - in the process they gained trust, grew and became stronger because of it.
If you really believe in the benevolence of Scientology, then be assured that it will stand this test and will emerge improved in the end.