![]() Terryeo's Profile
My Comments
Posted by: Terryeo on July 3, 2008 2:44 PM Why pay for your PR when anonymous public will give you all the PR you could ever want? Posted by: Terryeo on June 17, 2008 4:26 PM @Centurian 10. I saw the encyclopediadramatica page dedicated to me and left a little note on its talk page, rather than edit the article to delete the falsehoods. Hello? 90 percent of the article is falsehood and lie. Hello? Reality Check. As I've posted elsewhere to you Centurian 10, you are mistaken. I don't work with, nor personally know anyone within the OSA. Your peas are not in a row about that. I suppose I better ask you too, do you know the emotional response people have to persistent anger? ---- It is boredom. Big Yawn to you and your lies, Centurian 10. Posted by: Terryeo on April 14, 2008 6:48 AM I made an oppsey there. - If you don't rub elbows with criminals, you are less likely to be accused of criminality - Pardon me, I'm going to go chant that to the wall until I can say it aloud in a single breath without stuttering or pauses. Oh the lulz. Posted by: Terryeo on April 1, 2008 11:43 AM I'm going to simply state the obvious, and as simply as possible. Anonymous took responsibility for a DDoS attack, there were also the (probably fake) anthrax mailings. At the same time, and in the same lump, some of you wish to peacefully demonstrate. My conclusion is that some anonymous members intend to obey the law and some anonymous members don't. If those statements don't make sense to you, don't bother reading my suggestion. Which is, if you don't rub elbows with criminals, and you are less likely to be accused of criminality. There is no one on the planet, including expelled and declared suppressives, who have no communication with the Church of Scientology. Do don't jeopardize your future, don't ally yourself with the "Anonymous" name because it was preemptively owned and controlled by people who have done illegal, disgusting acts. Don't ally yourself with that. Posted by: Terryeo on March 31, 2008 9:29 PM Oh the Lulz! And I'm not going to do a "but seriously..." on a Lulz this fine! Posted by: Terryeo on March 29, 2008 2:00 AM First. heh. Posted by: Terryeo on March 26, 2008 7:02 PM If you keep at the criticism, be sure and let Dave Touretzky, know. He'll want to help you with the sale of your website, like he did with Chris Owen's critical site. Big Pharma is Big Bucks, don't forget. Posted by: Terryeo on March 18, 2008 8:29 PM *Gasp* could it be, could it really be that the Scientologists have been telling us the truth all of these years? Could it really be that people find it helpful? Posted by: Terryeo on March 3, 2008 1:40 PM Aha, Anoynymause, you have hammered my point home once more. You make a (very) confident statement that is (very) wrong. I responded to many of those sorts of things at wikipedia, Anoynymause, but those responses were ignored by critics because, after all, critics always know FOR SURE, don't they? You amuse me. Posted by: Terryeo on February 20, 2008 10:20 PM I am so amused by Neel Shah's assessment of the E-meter: Posted by: Terryeo on February 20, 2008 9:55 PM Yeah, but what kind of refreshments will anonymous bring to the party? Posted by: Terryeo on January 29, 2008 3:14 PM If it is intelligent to make note of failed attempts to suppress religion, then certainly the misinformation of the article presents examples of failed attempts to suppress religion. Others could be found. The German constitution guarantees a freedom of religion. How does this disparity exist, you ask? The German government is an active partner with its two official churches, donations to your church are collected by the government and dispersed to the two churches. There are strong, standing economic interests in Germany's religious discrimination. However, those interests fall under the German constitution. Posted by: Terryeo on December 11, 2007 1:21 AM |
|
|
||||
| ||||||
FIND OUT WHERE YOU ARE !