Radar

Media

Full Court Press

Charles Kaiser on McCain and "the race card"

  

PAGE 1 / 1

above-the-fold.jpg

fcpobama_1.jpg
(Photo: Getty Images)
"Obama continues to face a series of arbitrary and shifting public tests merely because he is black."
-Adam Serwer

Adam Serwer has the most important piece of the week in the American Prospect, explaining why race is certain to remain at the center of this campaign, regardless of how often either candidate mentions it. Here is the heart of the matter:

The McCain campaign's apparently race-neutral approach, and its subsequent accusation that the Obama campaign is playing the race card, is a well-thought-out strategy—it is pure Nixon...In a dispute about race, the McCain campaign knows it will end up with the larger half. For the most part, most white people's experience with race isn't one of racial discrimination. They can only relate to racial discrimination in the abstract. What white people can relate to is the fear of being unjustly accused of racism. This is the larger half. This is why allegations of racism often provoke more outrage than actual racism, because most of the country can relate to one (the accusation of racism) easier than the other (actual racism). For this reason, in a political conflict over race, the McCain campaign has the advantage, because saying the race card has been played is actually the ultimate race card.

Now that Karl Rove's acolyte Steve Schmidt has been given day-to-day control of the McCain campaign, this is certain to become one of the nastiest presidential campaigns we have ever seen. Since the economy is in free fall, and the best news out of Iraq is that fewer Americans are now being killed there than in Afghanistan, the Republicans really have nothing to work with except for the color of Obama's skin. So they will repeat what they have done in every campaign since Richard Nixon was elected in 1968: they will do everything they possibly can to exploit subliminal American fears of "the other."

racefcp_2.jpg
(Photo: Getty Images)
Nevertheless, there remain several reasons to be optimistic. Roger Wilkins, who is one of the wisest men in Washington, recited them to me today: "Obama really does care about ordinary people. It's genuine in him, and I think when it's displayed it'll make a huge difference. Despite the fact that his success in Berlin is being used against him I think it was good for him to do. The country needs change and lots and lots of people understand that. And finally, McCain—whatever he was back when the press fell in love with him—he's not that person anymore. He's a crotchety, clumsy, small-spirited man, and I think that will become apparent. The ads that he's putting up now demonstrate that. I think Obama will win."

I agree that odds remain in Obama's favor. But he will need a nearly flawless campaign to overcome the permanent disadvantage of the racism of a large minority of the American public.

Postscript: Uncomfortable confirmation in Saturday's New York Times from its newest op-ed columnist, Charles M. Blow.

08/08/08 3:34 PM
Related: Charles Kaiser, Full Court Press, Media
Send to a friend

Comments

Was this a paid Uhbama ad?

Seriously, intellectually dishonesty just manifests itself as stupidity. Obama comes out fear-mongering, and playing the race card "they're gonna say I don't look like the other (presidents)....", and McCain calls him out for it, and you accuse McCain of playing the race card. Then you go into your "Uhbama really loves people" spiel. Beautiful.

This article would be sad and pathetic if people weren't used to this kind of "reporting." Don't let your white-guilt eat ya up, bro.

ps: Disregard my comments: I just read some of your past articles and now realize you're a full-time leftist shill (and not a very good one).

Posted by: Hoss on August 14, 2008 9:04 AM

Hey Hoss! Did this strike a little close to home? This is pretty astute commentary. Doesn't seem to me that you can string together even an eight-word sentence without tripping over your tongue. Get a grip and calm down and you might be able to express yourself clearly someday, but I don't give it a lot of chance.

"White guilt"? Geez, such.... uh, imaginative phrasing you use

"Leftist shill"? And that would make you what, a uh, oh hell you know the word.

Sure, this is a condensation of the American Prospect piece, but that''s why you're here isn't it? To get the Cliff Notes version of things that you can't understand in the long form? How's that ADD coming along?

But, on the other hand, maybe you're just one of the "independent thinkers" who took McCain up on his offer of kewpie dolls and stuffed animals and other wonderful prizes for going around and doing your best to crap in other people's yards.

Damn, I'm glad I ain't got what you got.

Posted by: flywheelgrinding on August 15, 2008 3:09 PM